Skip to main content
← All Sandbox Comparisons

HEAD-TO-HEAD · PRICES VERIFIED 2026-08-25

Beam (sandbox) vs Cloudflare Containers

Across 3 benchmark profiles, Cloudflare Containers prices lower in 3 of 3 — by up to ~21% where the gap is widest. Both rows use identical workload inputs and USD list rates from the capture-dated catalog; verify current rates via each vendor's source link.

Monthly Cost Across Realistic Benchmarks

100 hr × 1 vCPU / 2 GiB
Beam (sandbox): $11.36 Cloudflare Containers: $9.00
Cheaper: Cloudflare Containers
500 hr × 2 vCPU / 4 GiB
Beam (sandbox): $113.58 Cloudflare Containers: $90.00
Cheaper: Cloudflare Containers
2,000 hr × 4 vCPU / 8 GiB
Beam (sandbox): $908.64 Cloudflare Containers: $720.00
Cheaper: Cloudflare Containers

Rate Card Snapshot

Vendor$/vCPU-hr$/GiB-hrBilling granularityConcurrency note
Beam (sandbox)$0.0675$0.0230per 0.001sNo self-serve concurrency cap published at capture time.
Cloudflare Containers$0.0720$0.0090per 0.01sRequires Workers Paid $5/mo. Included monthly: 375 vCPU-minutes, 25 GiB-hours memory, 200 GB-hours disk; usage beyond included bills at the listed rates.

Fit Notes

  • Beam (sandbox) — Skip if you want the biggest platform — young product; fine for browser/computer-use sandboxes, thinner on compliance and regions than E2B or Modal.
  • Cloudflare Containers — Skip if you want vendor-managed snapshot/resume semantics — Containers scale to zero but have no cross-machine session pause/resume story like E2B/Daytona snapshots.

Run your own workload through the full interactive calculator, or browse all pairs on the comparisons hub.