HEAD-TO-HEAD · PRICES VERIFIED 2026-08-25
Beam (sandbox) vs Northflank
Across 3 benchmark profiles, Northflank prices lower in 3 of 3 — by up to ~71% where the gap is widest. Both rows use identical workload inputs and USD list rates from the capture-dated catalog; verify current rates via each vendor's source link.
Monthly Cost Across Realistic Benchmarks
100 hr × 1 vCPU / 2 GiB
Beam (sandbox): $11.36 Northflank: $3.33
Cheaper: Northflank500 hr × 2 vCPU / 4 GiB
Beam (sandbox): $113.58 Northflank: $33.33
Cheaper: Northflank2,000 hr × 4 vCPU / 8 GiB
Beam (sandbox): $908.64 Northflank: $266.64
Cheaper: NorthflankRate Card Snapshot
| Vendor | $/vCPU-hr | $/GiB-hr | Billing granularity | Concurrency note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beam (sandbox) | $0.0675 | $0.0230 | per 0.001s | No self-serve concurrency cap published at capture time. |
| Northflank | $0.0167 | $0.0083 | per-second | No hard concurrency cap published; predefined plans from 0.1 shared vCPU / 256 MB to dedicated GPU tiers, custom plans available. |
Fit Notes
- Beam (sandbox) — Skip if you want the biggest platform — young product; fine for browser/computer-use sandboxes, thinner on compliance and regions than E2B or Modal.
- Northflank — Skip if you need agent-native session semantics (snapshot/pause-resume) — Northflank is general container platform pricing applied to long-running services and jobs, not a purpose-built agent sandbox SDK.
Run your own workload through the full interactive calculator, or browse all pairs on the comparisons hub.