Skip to main content
← All Sandbox Comparisons

HEAD-TO-HEAD · PRICES VERIFIED 2026-08-25

Daytona vs Beam (sandbox)

Across 3 benchmark profiles, Daytona prices lower in 3 of 3 — by up to ~27% where the gap is widest. Both rows use identical workload inputs and USD list rates from the capture-dated catalog; verify current rates via each vendor's source link.

Monthly Cost Across Realistic Benchmarks

100 hr × 1 vCPU / 2 GiB
Daytona: $8.28 Beam (sandbox): $11.36
Cheaper: Daytona
500 hr × 2 vCPU / 4 GiB
Daytona: $82.80 Beam (sandbox): $113.58
Cheaper: Daytona
2,000 hr × 4 vCPU / 8 GiB
Daytona: $662.40 Beam (sandbox): $908.64
Cheaper: Daytona

Rate Card Snapshot

Vendor$/vCPU-hr$/GiB-hrBilling granularityConcurrency note
Daytona$0.0504$0.0162per-secondNo self-serve concurrency cap published at capture time.
Beam (sandbox)$0.0675$0.0230per 0.001sNo self-serve concurrency cap published at capture time.

Fit Notes

  • Daytona — Skip if you want the most battle-tested SDK ecosystem — E2B has the larger community around code-interpreter sandboxes at identical rates.
  • Beam (sandbox) — Skip if you want the biggest platform — young product; fine for browser/computer-use sandboxes, thinner on compliance and regions than E2B or Modal.

Run your own workload through the full interactive calculator, or browse all pairs on the comparisons hub.