Skip to main content
← All Sandbox Comparisons

HEAD-TO-HEAD · PRICES VERIFIED 2026-08-25

E2B vs Cloudflare Containers

Across 3 benchmark profiles, E2B prices lower in 3 of 3 — by up to ~8% where the gap is widest. Both rows use identical workload inputs and USD list rates from the capture-dated catalog; verify current rates via each vendor's source link.

Monthly Cost Across Realistic Benchmarks

100 hr × 1 vCPU / 2 GiB
E2B: $8.28 Cloudflare Containers: $9.00
Cheaper: E2B
500 hr × 2 vCPU / 4 GiB
E2B: $82.80 Cloudflare Containers: $90.00
Cheaper: E2B
2,000 hr × 4 vCPU / 8 GiB
E2B: $662.40 Cloudflare Containers: $720.00
Cheaper: E2B

Rate Card Snapshot

Vendor$/vCPU-hr$/GiB-hrBilling granularityConcurrency note
E2B$0.0504$0.0162per-secondHobby ≤20 concurrent sandboxes; Pro ≤100 (extensible to 1,100). Session caps: ≤1h Hobby, ≤24h Pro.
Cloudflare Containers$0.0720$0.0090per 0.01sRequires Workers Paid $5/mo. Included monthly: 375 vCPU-minutes, 25 GiB-hours memory, 200 GB-hours disk; usage beyond included bills at the listed rates.

Fit Notes

  • E2B — Skip if your agents need long-lived environments — Hobby sessions die at 1h and Pro at 24h; this is for short-lived code-running sandboxes.
  • Cloudflare Containers — Skip if you want vendor-managed snapshot/resume semantics — Containers scale to zero but have no cross-machine session pause/resume story like E2B/Daytona snapshots.

Run your own workload through the full interactive calculator, or browse all pairs on the comparisons hub.